當(dāng)前位置：法律圖書(shū)館>>法治動(dòng)態(tài)>>期刊目錄>>《法學(xué)雜志》2012年第二期目錄與摘要

《法學(xué)雜志》2012年第二期目錄與摘要

http://www.ggmww.com　 2012-7-24 14:55:11　 來(lái)源：中國(guó)法學(xué)會(huì)網(wǎng)

1 、劉金國(guó)教授
【摘要】 <正>劉金國(guó),河北冀州人,1940年10月生于內(nèi)蒙古通遼市,中國(guó)政法大學(xué)教授、博士生導(dǎo)師,北京市法學(xué)會(huì)法理學(xué)研究會(huì)會(huì)長(zhǎng)。1991年-2002年任中國(guó)政法大學(xué)學(xué)位委員會(huì)委員、法理學(xué)教研室主任、導(dǎo)師組組長(zhǎng);1997年-2002年任教育部全國(guó)高等法學(xué)
 
【關(guān)鍵詞】 法理學(xué)研究； 金國(guó)； 北京市； 博士生導(dǎo)師； 內(nèi)蒙古通遼市； 法學(xué)會(huì)； 大學(xué)教授； 高等法學(xué)教育； 學(xué)位委員會(huì)； 教研室主任；
  
 
2 、中國(guó)古代的“權(quán)力”理念——兼論中國(guó)古代社會(huì)的政體與法律 馬小紅（中國(guó)人民大學(xué)法學(xué)院）  
【摘要】 中國(guó)傳統(tǒng)社會(huì)的制度、價(jià)值觀與西方確實(shí)有著諸多的不同。中國(guó)傳統(tǒng)法律文化將"權(quán)力"視為治國(guó)工具,而西方先人一開(kāi)始就對(duì)權(quán)力充滿戒心。本文分析了孟德斯鳩、魁奈等西方啟蒙思想家和梁?jiǎn)⒊�等�?duì)古代中國(guó)政體的認(rèn)識(shí),并引申出一個(gè)問(wèn)題,即如何定義中國(guó)古代社會(huì)的性質(zhì)。中西不同的權(quán)力理念源于對(duì)人性認(rèn)識(shí)的差異。先秦儒家認(rèn)為"人性善",對(duì)賢人始終寄予希望;先秦法家則認(rèn)為"人性惡",主張利用"人性",加強(qiáng)君主的權(quán)力。西方先哲亞里士多德則堅(jiān)持以法治限制人性,制約權(quán)力。中國(guó)古代社會(huì)的政權(quán)是一個(gè)畏懼、榮譽(yù)、品德兼而有之的"混合政體",中國(guó)的"傳統(tǒng)法"是"禮與法"的共同體。
【Abstract】 Chinese traditional social system and values are different from western countries. In Chinese traditional legal culture, people regard "Power" as an instrument of administering a country. But Westerners are wary of power from the beginning. This article analyzes Montesquieu, Quesney and Liang Ch’ich’ao’s viewpoints towards the system of government of Ancient China, and it also invites a question: how can we define the nature of Chinese ancient society. The different ideas of power between Chinese and Westerners derive from the different cognitions of human nature. The Confucians believe "human nature is kind-hearted", and they place hope on sages. The Legalists believe "human nature is evil" and Monarchs should strengthen their power by taking advantage of it. Aristotle believes that in order to restrict power, human nature should be limited by rule of law. The regime of Chinese ancient society is mixed with fear, honour and morality. Chinese "traditional law" is a community of "propriety and law".
 
【關(guān)鍵詞】 權(quán)力； 政體； 法律；
【Key words】 power system of government law；
 
3 、中國(guó)古代刑法禁約制度的歷史考察  萬(wàn)川（北京市社會(huì)科學(xué)院）; 
【摘要】 刑法禁約起源于北魏,造極于兩宋,至明清而發(fā)生新變化。刑法禁約制度的調(diào)整對(duì)象和范圍十分廣泛。禁約條文是帶有皇權(quán)干預(yù)特點(diǎn)的禁止性和命令性條款,與敕令格式的法律約束力相同;禁約獨(dú)立于刑律之外,是與刑律并列的法律形式;禁約具有因時(shí)、因地制宜的特點(diǎn),不具備常法的穩(wěn)定性;禁約表現(xiàn)出中國(guó)古代法制諸法合體的共同特點(diǎn)。在刑律和敕令格式之外大量制頒刑法禁約,是法制建設(shè)適應(yīng)經(jīng)濟(jì)社會(huì)快速變化需要的必然結(jié)果。
【Abstract】 Originated from Beiwei and completed in Song,the Prohibitive decree changed during the Ming and Qing dynasty.The object and range of the prohibitive decree system was very widely.It’s terms were prohibitive and injunctive which present characteristics of imperial power or authority and it’s legally binding was same as the prohibitive decree paralleled with and was independent of criminals,incording to time and place.It was no stable as ordinary legal provision,but presented a commom trait that various kinds of laws were integrated in ancient times of China.Besides the criminals and the edict,Issue of a lot of prohibitive decrees reflected an inevitable consequence that legal construction must be adapt to requirement of development of economic and society.
 
【關(guān)鍵詞】 古代； 刑法禁約； 發(fā)展演變；
【Key words】 ancient prohibitive decree evolution；
 
4 、《大清違警律》立法源流探析  沈嵐（安徽大學(xué)法學(xué)院）; 
【摘要】 租界里豐富的治安法規(guī)及良好的實(shí)施效果為清末治安模式的轉(zhuǎn)型提供了鮮活的示范,而日本刑法中的"違警罪"專(zhuān)編則成為了清末治安立法的參考摹本。伴隨著中央最高警政機(jī)構(gòu)民政部的設(shè)立,《違警罪章程》倉(cāng)促登場(chǎng),卻很快就因粗糙簡(jiǎn)陋被《大清違警律》取而代之。后者的面世則是中國(guó)近代治安處罰法規(guī)正式形成的標(biāo)志。
【Abstract】 Lots of regulations for public security administration in concessions implemented well. It set a good example for the transition of the public security administration system in Late Qing. The part named Wei-jing Offence in the criminal law of Japan became the direct reference for the legislations of the public security administration system in Late Qing. The establishment of the Legal Issues of Wei-jing Offence came in a rush with the founding of the Ministry of Civil Affairs,but soon was to be replaced by the Wei-jing Law of Qing because it was too simple. The Wei-jing Law of Qing was the first formal law of the public security administration in Late Qing.
 
【關(guān)鍵詞】 清末； 治安法規(guī)； 《違警罪章程》； 《大清違警律》；
【Key words】 late Qing Dynasty legislations of the public security administration legal issues of Wei-jing offence Wei-jing law of Qing Dynasty；
 
5 、論中國(guó)傳統(tǒng)家族司法主體的權(quán)力——以國(guó)家法律對(duì)家族長(zhǎng)權(quán)力的確認(rèn)為視角  原美林（湘潭大學(xué)法學(xué)院）; 
【摘要】 中國(guó)傳統(tǒng)家族司法是當(dāng)今法律文化研究的重點(diǎn),其司法主體如何在司法過(guò)程中實(shí)施司法權(quán)和國(guó)家如何看待這一權(quán)力的應(yīng)用,引發(fā)了對(duì)傳統(tǒng)家族長(zhǎng)權(quán)力現(xiàn)代變遷的深刻思考。我們?cè)诶斫鈬?guó)家法律與基層司法相結(jié)合治理社會(huì)這一法律文化的基礎(chǔ)上,研究中國(guó)傳統(tǒng)家族司法主體的權(quán)力,能夠得出現(xiàn)代家族長(zhǎng)的權(quán)力與民族現(xiàn)代化發(fā)展互容互補(bǔ)的結(jié)論。
【Abstract】 With the traditional Chinese family judicature as the focal points of today’s legal culture research, how the subject authority implements its judicial power and how it is looked on by the state have aroused deep thinking about the modern transition of family patriarch’s authority. Studying the subject authority of traditional Chinese family judicature based on the understanding of the legal culture that social governance can be maintained by combining the best of the national law and grassroots judicature, we’ve come to the conclusion that modern family patriarch’s authority and the development of national modernization are compatible and complementary.
 
【關(guān)鍵詞】 家族司法； 國(guó)家法律； 主體權(quán)力； 現(xiàn)代變遷；
【Key words】 family judicature national law subject authority modern transition；
 
6 、《勞動(dòng)合同法》的不足與完善——《勞動(dòng)合同法》在中小企業(yè)適用的法經(jīng)濟(jì)學(xué)分析  馮玉軍（中國(guó)人民大學(xué)法學(xué)院）;方鵬（中國(guó)銀河證劵股份有限公司）; 
【摘要】 在金融危機(jī)的背景下,《勞動(dòng)合同法》在中小企業(yè)中遭遇多種類(lèi)型的實(shí)施困境,導(dǎo)致企業(yè)在實(shí)際經(jīng)營(yíng)中多方采取逃避《勞動(dòng)合同法》的做法。本文僅就企業(yè)、工人雙方基于《勞動(dòng)合同法》框架下的非合作博弈關(guān)系,從博弈論以及勞動(dòng)力供求關(guān)系雙重角度論證了《勞動(dòng)合同法》實(shí)施困難的必然性以及原因。建議在中小企業(yè)中構(gòu)建新型勞動(dòng)關(guān)系,在企業(yè)與工人博弈的過(guò)程中,地方政府亦應(yīng)當(dāng)采取切實(shí)的措施提升《勞動(dòng)合同法》對(duì)勞動(dòng)關(guān)系的影響力以及對(duì)工人的保護(hù)力度,進(jìn)而為實(shí)現(xiàn)經(jīng)濟(jì)增長(zhǎng)方式的轉(zhuǎn)變提供內(nèi)在動(dòng)力和助力。
【Abstract】 Under the background of financial crisis, the labor contract law encounters various types of difficulties from SMEs, and enterprises take many ways to avoid the labor contract law in practice. The paper analyzes the reason why the labor contract law carries out so hardly from the perspective of the game theory and labor supply-demand theory between enterprises and laborers, suggests that new relationship between enterprises and laborers should be formed in SMEs, that the government should take effective measures to improve the labor law’s influence on labor relationship and protection for laborers, by which the government can help to realize the change of economic growth.
 
【關(guān)鍵詞】 勞動(dòng)合同法； 中小企業(yè)； 非合作博弈； 解困之道；
【Key words】 labor contract law small and medium enterprises non-cooperative game solution；
 
7 、國(guó)家資助項(xiàng)目職務(wù)發(fā)明權(quán)利配置的法經(jīng)濟(jì)探析  胡朝陽(yáng)（東南大學(xué)法學(xué)院）; 
【摘要】 國(guó)家資助項(xiàng)目中職務(wù)發(fā)明權(quán)利配置面臨諸多法律法規(guī)與行政規(guī)章的規(guī)范競(jìng)合,其規(guī)范適用效果須以其能否有效促進(jìn)其職務(wù)發(fā)明權(quán)利流轉(zhuǎn)為判定基準(zhǔn),其效率價(jià)值實(shí)現(xiàn)有賴增進(jìn)其職務(wù)發(fā)明權(quán)利流轉(zhuǎn)、減小其交易成本、確保利益受損者獲得有效補(bǔ)償,完善其有關(guān)制度安排須明晰其職務(wù)發(fā)明權(quán)屬的法定范圍,完備其職務(wù)發(fā)明人的優(yōu)先申請(qǐng)、優(yōu)先受讓與優(yōu)先實(shí)施專(zhuān)利等法定權(quán)利,強(qiáng)化其職務(wù)發(fā)明人的法定義務(wù)。
【Abstract】 There are some problems on normative conflict among laws, regulations and administrative rules with regard to the right configuration about service invention in the government-funded project. The benchmark for judging its effect of application of norms is if norms effectively promote the right of service invention to transfer. The realization of its efficiency value depends on enhancing its service invention circulation and reducing its transaction cost and ensuring its loser’s acquisition of effective compensation. And the improvement of its institutional arrangement depends on defining the statutory range of ownership of service invention, perfecting the service inventor’s statutory rights such as priority application, priority transferee and priority implementation of its patent, etc, and strengthening the service inventor’s statutory obligation.
 
【關(guān)鍵詞】 職務(wù)發(fā)明； 權(quán)利配置； 效率； 國(guó)家資助項(xiàng)目；
【Key words】 service invention right configuration efficiency the government-funded project；
 
8  、權(quán)力腐敗的法理透析  劉金國(guó)（中國(guó)政法大學(xué)）;
【摘要】 堅(jiān)決懲治權(quán)力腐敗和有效預(yù)防權(quán)力腐敗,關(guān)系人心向背和黨的生死存亡,這一重大課題始終是我們黨和國(guó)家面臨的重大政治任務(wù)。權(quán)力腐敗是權(quán)力的權(quán)利化和權(quán)力的非責(zé)任化,因?yàn)闄?quán)力時(shí)刻存在著走向腐敗的可能性,權(quán)力具有私欲性,權(quán)力具有可交換性,權(quán)力具有不平等性。權(quán)力腐敗的本質(zhì)是剝削,其法律屬性與民本、民生、和諧社會(huì)、核心價(jià)值體系完全相悖。要充分認(rèn)識(shí)反腐倡廉建設(shè)的戰(zhàn)略意義,充分認(rèn)識(shí)反腐敗斗爭(zhēng)的長(zhǎng)期性、復(fù)雜性和艱巨性。
【Abstract】 To fight against power corruption stoutly and prevent it efficiently is related to what the people are for and against, it is also critical to the CCP. The research about it is also one of the most important political task to the CCP and our country. Power corruption means abuse of power. Power might lead to corruption at any time. Power has the characteristic of exclusion, interchangeability and unequality. The substance of power corruption is exploitation and the nature of it in law is totally contrary to democracy, harmony and other core values. We should fully realize the strategical significance of combating corruption and upholding integrity, fully understand that the fight of anti-corruption is a long, difficult and complicated task.
 
【關(guān)鍵詞】 權(quán)力腐敗； 剝削； 法理透析；
【Key words】 power corruption exploitation legal perspective；
 
9 、亞洲建立區(qū)域人權(quán)機(jī)制的路徑與選擇  楊成銘（北京理工大學(xué)法學(xué)院）; 
【摘要】 亞洲區(qū)域人權(quán)機(jī)制建設(shè)是當(dāng)代國(guó)際人權(quán)法中最受關(guān)注的主題之一。亞洲建立區(qū)域人權(quán)機(jī)制是施行《世界人權(quán)宣言》和維護(hù)本區(qū)域人權(quán)的有效途徑,亞洲現(xiàn)有人權(quán)機(jī)制具有局限性,應(yīng)在亞洲未來(lái)人權(quán)機(jī)制建設(shè)模式選擇的基礎(chǔ)上,結(jié)合歐洲、非洲和美洲區(qū)域人權(quán)機(jī)制的經(jīng)驗(yàn)和缺陷,創(chuàng)建和完善亞洲區(qū)域人權(quán)機(jī)制的路徑和方法。
【Abstract】 Establishing regional human rights mechanism in Asia is one of the hot spots in international law of human rights. This paper will discuss the functions of Asian regional human rights mechanism in enforcing Universal Declaration of Human Rights and the maintenance of Asian human rights, and on the basis of discussion on the restriction of the current Asian human rights mechanisms and model of future regional human rights mechanism in Asia as well as the experiences and morals of other regional human rights mechanisms in Europe, America and Africa, the approaches and means of founding and perfecting regional human rights mechanism in Asia will be mainly dissertated.
 
【關(guān)鍵詞】 亞洲； 人權(quán)機(jī)制； 路徑； 選擇；
【Key words】 Asia human rights mechanism approach choice；
 
10 、我國(guó)自然資源生態(tài)損害私法救濟(jì)的不足及對(duì)策  張梓太（復(fù)旦大學(xué)）;王嵐（武漢大學(xué)環(huán)境法研究所）; 
【摘要】 自然資源兼具經(jīng)濟(jì)價(jià)值和生態(tài)價(jià)值,自然資源生態(tài)損害的私法救濟(jì)在其他各國(guó)法中獲得了廣泛的支持。而我國(guó)法律未明確界定自然資源生態(tài)損害及其賠償范圍、賠償權(quán)利主體等,不利于自然資源的保護(hù)。我國(guó)私法應(yīng)明確自然資源生態(tài)損害的賠償范圍、賠償權(quán)利主體,完善侵權(quán)損害賠償救濟(jì)制度,建立社會(huì)化的生態(tài)損害賠償機(jī)制,重視預(yù)防性責(zé)任在防范自然資源生態(tài)損害中的作用。
 【Abstract】 Natural resource contains both economic and ecological values. And private legal relief for the damages of natural resources is practiced in a lot of countries. In China, there are no specific provisions regarding the scope of the remedy for the damages to natural resources, nor of the subjects who are entitled to claim for the remedies. This is not good for the protection of the natural resources. The private laws in China should have specific provisions regarding the scope of the remedy and the subjects that are entitled to the remedy. We should also perfect the legal remedy institution for tort-related damages, establish socialized remedy institution for ecological damages, and focus on the role of preventive liability in the area of preventing ecological damages to natural resources.
 
【關(guān)鍵詞】 自然資源； 生態(tài)損害； 私法救濟(jì)；
【Key words】 natural resources ecological damages private legal remedy；
 
11 、論食品安全監(jiān)督過(guò)失責(zé)任  劉期湘（湖南商學(xué)院法學(xué)院）;張斌（山東省濟(jì)寧市任城區(qū)人民檢察院）; 
【摘要】 監(jiān)督過(guò)失是指處于放置危險(xiǎn)狀態(tài)的上位監(jiān)督者以及管理者地位的人違反監(jiān)督、管理義務(wù),對(duì)其應(yīng)當(dāng)避免的危害結(jié)果發(fā)生的過(guò)失心理狀態(tài)。危懼感說(shuō)是食品生產(chǎn)經(jīng)營(yíng)管理者負(fù)監(jiān)督過(guò)失責(zé)任的理論依據(jù)。根據(jù)危懼感說(shuō),食品生產(chǎn)經(jīng)營(yíng)者處于保證人的地位,監(jiān)督管理者不適用信賴原則。在確定食品生產(chǎn)經(jīng)營(yíng)者的注意義務(wù)時(shí),一定要將其在立場(chǎng)上與消費(fèi)者相對(duì)立的同生產(chǎn)、銷(xiāo)售等市場(chǎng)運(yùn)作過(guò)程相聯(lián)系的特殊性作為最基本的出發(fā)點(diǎn)。
【Abstract】 Supervisory negligence is the psychological condition of the persons, who are in the leading positions or in the position of coordinating in business areas, causing harmful consequences because of his or her negligence or overconfidence which he should have avoided. The fear of doctrine is the theoretical basis of food production managers who are responsible for supervisory negligence liability. According to the fear that, food production operators are in the guarantor’s position and supervisory managers do not apply to the principle of trust. When we determine the attentive obligation of food production operators, we must take the specific characteristics of the links to marketing operation as the fundamental starting point, which is opposite to consumers in the position of production and sale.
 
【關(guān)鍵詞】 食品安全； 監(jiān)督過(guò)失； 危懼感說(shuō)； 注意義務(wù)；
【Key words】 food safety supervisory negligence fear of doctrine obligation of care；
 
12 、我國(guó)外匯保證金交易法律制度構(gòu)建初探  徐磊（上海建橋?qū)W院）; 
【摘要】 監(jiān)督過(guò)失是指處于放置危險(xiǎn)狀態(tài)的上位監(jiān)督者以及管理者地位的人違反監(jiān)督、管理義務(wù),對(duì)其應(yīng)當(dāng)避免的危害結(jié)果發(fā)生的過(guò)失心理狀態(tài)。危懼感說(shuō)是食品生產(chǎn)經(jīng)營(yíng)管理者負(fù)監(jiān)督過(guò)失責(zé)任的理論依據(jù)。根據(jù)危懼感說(shuō),食品生產(chǎn)經(jīng)營(yíng)者處于保證人的地位,監(jiān)督管理者不適用信賴原則。在確定食品生產(chǎn)經(jīng)營(yíng)者的注意義務(wù)時(shí),一定要將其在立場(chǎng)上與消費(fèi)者相對(duì)立的同生產(chǎn)、銷(xiāo)售等市場(chǎng)運(yùn)作過(guò)程相聯(lián)系的特殊性作為最基本的出發(fā)點(diǎn)。
【Abstract】 Supervisory negligence is the psychological condition of the persons, who are in the leading positions or in the position of coordinating in business areas, causing harmful consequences because of his or her negligence or overconfidence which he should have avoided. The fear of doctrine is the theoretical basis of food production managers who are responsible for supervisory negligence liability. According to the fear that, food production operators are in the guarantor’s position and supervisory managers do not apply to the principle of trust. When we determine the attentive obligation of food production operators, we must take the specific characteristics of the links to marketing operation as the fundamental starting point, which is opposite to consumers in the position of production and sale.
 
【關(guān)鍵詞】 食品安全； 監(jiān)督過(guò)失； 危懼感說(shuō)； 注意義務(wù)；
【Key words】 food safety supervisory negligence fear of doctrine obligation of care；
 
13 、論著作權(quán)默示許可使用的立法實(shí)踐  張今;陳倩婷（中國(guó)政法大學(xué)民商法學(xué)院）; 
【摘要】 隨著互聯(lián)網(wǎng)技術(shù)的快速發(fā)展,現(xiàn)實(shí)生活中出現(xiàn)了大量的著作權(quán)默示許可行為,在著作權(quán)立法方面,也出現(xiàn)了對(duì)著作權(quán)默示許可的一些嘗試。不過(guò),無(wú)論是以美國(guó)為代表的判例法國(guó)家在互聯(lián)網(wǎng)新技術(shù)與數(shù)字圖書(shū)館方面的裹足不前還是我國(guó)在《信息網(wǎng)絡(luò)傳播權(quán)保護(hù)條例》中的淺嘗輒止,都不能滿足現(xiàn)實(shí)中大量著作權(quán)默示許可行為的制度需求。著作權(quán)默示許可使用可以在不改變現(xiàn)有的著作權(quán)法結(jié)構(gòu)的前提下,有效地調(diào)和互聯(lián)網(wǎng)的共享性與著作權(quán)的私權(quán)性之間的矛盾,因此構(gòu)建著作權(quán)默示許可制度不僅在當(dāng)下十分必要,而且也將是著作權(quán)法發(fā)展的大勢(shì)所趨。
【Abstract】 With the rapid development of Internet technology, numerous conducts of copyright implied license have appeared in reality, as well as the attempt in legislation. However, neither the standstill in terms of digital libraries in the U.S. judge-made law, nor the tiny alteration could meet the need of the institution of copyright implied license in the real life. Actually, the copyright implied license can effectively solve the contradiction between the sharing of Internet and the privilege of copyright, without altering the structure of the existing copyright law. Therefore, it is not only necessary at present but also a tendency of development of copyright law to contribute a general institution of copyright implied license. 　
【關(guān)鍵詞】 著作權(quán)； 默示許可；
【Key words】 copyright implied license；
 
14 、地方政府實(shí)施商標(biāo)戰(zhàn)略的省思  儲(chǔ)敏（南京財(cái)經(jīng)大學(xué)法學(xué)院）;   
【摘要】 近年來(lái),國(guó)內(nèi)掀起了一股實(shí)施商標(biāo)戰(zhàn)略的熱潮,多個(gè)地方政府制定并頒布了實(shí)施商標(biāo)戰(zhàn)略的規(guī)范性文件。然而,地方政府實(shí)施商標(biāo)戰(zhàn)略的目標(biāo)以及地方政府實(shí)施的"重金獎(jiǎng)勵(lì)馳名商標(biāo)"、"政府優(yōu)先采購(gòu)馳名商標(biāo)及著名商標(biāo)稱(chēng)號(hào)獲得者的產(chǎn)品"、"鼓勵(lì)商號(hào)與商標(biāo)的一體化"等商標(biāo)戰(zhàn)略措施都值得省思。
【Abstract】 In recent years, the tide of implementing trademark strategy has been heated up in our country; many local governments established and promulgated their normative documents on the implementation of trademark strategy. However, the target and some measures in those normative documents deserve to be reflected, such as "heavily rewarding trademarks"; "prioritizing to purchase the products of well-known trademark and famous trademark in government procurement"; "encouraging the integration of trade names and trademarks", etc
 
【關(guān)鍵詞】 地方政府； 商標(biāo)戰(zhàn)略； 馳名商標(biāo)；
【Key words】 local governments trademark strategy well-known trademark；
 
15 、企業(yè)維持原則在解散公司之訴中的體現(xiàn)——以《新公司法司法解釋二》為視角  王瑞（北方工業(yè)大學(xué)）;叢奔（山東省齊魯律師事務(wù)所）; 
【摘要】 通過(guò)對(duì)《新公司法司法解釋二》中股東請(qǐng)求解散公司訴訟具體規(guī)定的分析,揭示企業(yè)維持原則在股東請(qǐng)求解散公司之訴的立法和法律適用中的體現(xiàn),繼而在對(duì)企業(yè)維持原則更深層次理解之基礎(chǔ)上分析這種指導(dǎo)思想得以貫徹的原因�？梢哉f(shuō),企業(yè)維持原則已成為股東和利益之間維持利益平衡的一個(gè)支點(diǎn)。
【Abstract】 By way of analyses the regulations of Judicial Dissolution of Corporation by Shareholders in Judicial Interpretation 2 of the New Company Law of PRC, digs up the legislative and juridical embodiments of Principle of Enterprises Maintaining in Judicial Dissolution of Corporation by Shareholders. Then, based on the deeper understanding, we analyses the reason that the Principle of Enterprises Maintaining can be carried out. It absolutely shows that, the Principle of Enterprises Maintaining has already become an interest fulcrum between shareholders and the corporate.
 
【關(guān)鍵詞】 企業(yè)維持原則； 解散公司之訴；
【Key words】 principle of enterprises maintaining judicial dissolution of corporation；
 
16 、再論訴訟擔(dān)當(dāng)——以擔(dān)當(dāng)人和被擔(dān)當(dāng)人在實(shí)體法和程序法上的關(guān)系為視角  張曉茹（北京航空航天大學(xué)法學(xué)院）;   
【摘要】 對(duì)訴訟擔(dān)當(dāng)概念的理解不一致造成了我國(guó)學(xué)者對(duì)訴訟擔(dān)當(dāng)范圍和類(lèi)型的分歧。對(duì)訴訟擔(dān)當(dāng)?shù)膶W(xué)理分類(lèi)分歧主要存在于任意訴訟擔(dān)當(dāng)之中,因而建議采"與實(shí)體權(quán)一起進(jìn)行訴訟追行委托的訴訟擔(dān)當(dāng)"與"僅僅就訴訟追行進(jìn)行委托的訴訟擔(dān)當(dāng)"的分類(lèi),以達(dá)到訴訟擔(dān)當(dāng)內(nèi)涵與外延的一致。從法定擔(dān)當(dāng)和任意擔(dān)當(dāng)?shù)慕嵌忍剿髟V訟擔(dān)當(dāng)?shù)木唧w形態(tài),分析訴訟擔(dān)當(dāng)人與被擔(dān)當(dāng)人實(shí)體法和程序法上的關(guān)系,只要符合訴訟擔(dān)當(dāng)?shù)母拍睢⒅贫鹊脑O(shè)置目的并具有訴訟擔(dān)當(dāng)?shù)墓δ芏紤?yīng)當(dāng)屬于訴訟擔(dān)當(dāng)。 　
【Abstract】 Litigation undertaking system in civil action plays an important role in solving the segregation of civil subject and litigation subject. With the different comprehension in the concept of litigation undertaking, our country’s scholars have different views on the range of application. The main divergence on the theoretic classification of litigation taking is on the discretional undertaking. And the classification of "the litigation undertaking with both substantive right and litigious right" and "the litigation undertaking with only litigious right" can help to reach the integration of intension and extension of the concept. This paper illustrates the application of the litigation undertaking through legal undertaking and discretional undertaking. By analyzing the relationship between litigation undertaker and undertaken-person in substantive law and procedural law, the paper comes to the conclusion that the action which can match the concept and the aim of undertaking system and has the function of undertaking can be regard as litigation undertaking.
 
【關(guān)鍵詞】 訴訟擔(dān)當(dāng)； 概念； 學(xué)理分類(lèi)； 具體形態(tài)；
【Key words】 litigation undertaking system concept theoretic classification application；
 
17 、我國(guó)臺(tái)灣地區(qū)死刑控制及其對(duì)大陸死刑改革的啟示  王秀梅;曾賽剛（北京師范大學(xué)）; 
【摘要】 本文從立法和司法兩個(gè)方面分析了我國(guó)臺(tái)灣地區(qū)死刑立法模式、死刑適用條件、死刑適用范圍、死刑規(guī)定方式的控制以及死刑案件程序、死刑赦免、死刑執(zhí)行的控制,還分析了我國(guó)臺(tái)灣地區(qū)死刑立法控制和司法控制的理念。通過(guò)這兩個(gè)方面的分析發(fā)現(xiàn),臺(tái)灣地區(qū)死刑控制與我國(guó)大陸死刑的改革方向不謀而合,即對(duì)已滿75周歲的老年人犯罪絕對(duì)不適用死刑。此外,臺(tái)灣地區(qū)死刑控制對(duì)我國(guó)大陸死刑改革也有一定的啟示,即將死刑適用的具體條件限定為危害生命或健康的嚴(yán)重犯罪;廢除絕對(duì)死刑;提高無(wú)期徒刑的假釋門(mén)檻、新增重罪累犯不得假釋的規(guī)定、延長(zhǎng)死刑追訴權(quán)期限;增設(shè)死刑案件強(qiáng)制上訴制度,等等。 　
【Abstract】 This paper analyzes the death penalty control in China Taiwan from perspectives of death penalty legislation, condition of applying for death penalty, procedural control on death penalty, amnesty and execution. With these analysis, the paper reaches the following enlightenment: there is no more death penalty on person who is over 75 years old; death penalty imposed on crimes that seriously endanger life and health of human beings; death penalty should not be the absolute sentence; increasing the criteria of parole on life imprisonment; adding the provision of without parole on serious crime and recidivism; lasting the period of prosecution on death penalty case; and set up the system of enforcing appeal for death penalty case.
 
【關(guān)鍵詞】 死刑立法； 死刑司法； 死刑控制； 啟示；
【Key words】 legislation on death penalty judicial practice death penalty control；
 
 
18 、單位犯罪存在范圍的批判性反思  曾友祥（華南理工大學(xué)法學(xué)院）;王聿連（山東省濟(jì)寧市嘉祥縣人民檢察院）; 
【摘要】 市場(chǎng)經(jīng)濟(jì)的進(jìn)一步發(fā)展催生出了更多的單位犯罪,我國(guó)1997年《刑法》正式將單位確定為犯罪主體,這對(duì)于打擊單位犯罪具有里程碑式的意義。但是,由于立法層面上沒(méi)有兼顧單位犯罪與自然人犯罪之間的邏輯平衡,加之刑法理論界相關(guān)研究的匱乏,導(dǎo)致在司法層面上對(duì)單位犯罪的認(rèn)定各行其是,以致使得刑事司法難以應(yīng)對(duì)諸多的新型單位犯罪。因此,針對(duì)單位犯罪研究與司法操作的混亂局面,深入探究單位犯罪與自然人犯罪的關(guān)系,進(jìn)而全面思索刑事立法對(duì)于單位犯罪加以干預(yù)范圍的明確化和視角轉(zhuǎn)換問(wèn)題,對(duì)于完善單位犯罪刑法規(guī)制體系具有立法和理論研究的必要性和前瞻性。　
【Abstract】 The further development of market economy has given birth to more crimes committed by units, in 1997,China Criminal Law formally identified corporate crime as the subject of a crime, which is a milestone for combating corporate crime. However, legislation does not keep a logical balance between natural crime and corporate crime, coupled with the lack of relevant research, thus, in the judicial level, the identification of crimes committed by units varies, which makes it difficult to deal with lots of criminal justice crimes committed by units. Practice of the corporate crime is in mess, therefore, it is vital for us to do the deep exploration for the relationship between corporate crime and natural crime, and the fully thought for criminal legislation of corporate crimes, which is also important to improve the corporate crime criminal law system and meet the need for theoretical research and forward-looking.
 
【關(guān)鍵詞】 單位犯罪； 自然人犯罪； 比較法； 定罪條款； 量刑條款；
【Key words】 corporate crime natural crime comparative laws conviction articles discretion articles；
 
19 、《刑事訴訟法修正案(草案)》的功能性分析  葉青;譚志鵬（上海社會(huì)科學(xué)院）; 
【摘要】 訴訟功能認(rèn)識(shí)的偏差影響人們對(duì)訴訟的運(yùn)用及訴訟理論、訴訟制度的建構(gòu)。我國(guó)《刑事訴訟法》修改一方面不應(yīng)削弱懲罰犯罪的功能,另一方面也應(yīng)進(jìn)一步強(qiáng)化人權(quán)保障的功能。本文試圖在對(duì)《中華人民共和國(guó)刑訴法修正案(草案)》作功能性分析的基礎(chǔ)上,圍繞我國(guó)《刑事訴訟法》修改中的幾個(gè)爭(zhēng)議問(wèn)題,提出以強(qiáng)化與完善相關(guān)制度與程序予以解決的方法和建議。 　
【Abstract】 Understanding of the function of litigation has a great impact on legal practice and the infrastructure of litigation theory and system. In the new amendment of China criminal procedural law, its functional character of penalizing crime should not be weakened. Meanwhile, its functional character of protecting human rights should be further strengthened. Based on the analysis of the functional character of the amendment of China criminal procedural law, this article will discuss several typical controversial topics, and provide practical legal advice on the litigation procedure and system.
 
【關(guān)鍵詞】 刑事訴訟法； 修正案草案； 功能性分析；
【Key words】 criminal procedural law drafted amendment analysis on the functional character；
 
20 、如實(shí)回答與沉默權(quán)的功能主義分析與文化解釋  白冬（天津財(cái)經(jīng)大學(xué)法學(xué)院）; 
【摘要】 如實(shí)回答與沉默權(quán)作為一項(xiàng)具體的法律制度屬于"人造之物",具有特定的功能。從功能主義出發(fā),梳理如實(shí)回答與沉默權(quán)在各自不同訴訟結(jié)構(gòu)中的功能性作用,說(shuō)明其影響訴訟結(jié)構(gòu)之機(jī)理。如實(shí)回答與沉默權(quán)亦是"文化之物"。通過(guò)文化解釋,剖析如實(shí)回答與沉默權(quán)所蘊(yùn)含的價(jià)值判斷,回答了決定二者廢與立的決定性原因。功能主義分析與文化解釋的相互補(bǔ)充性的闡釋,解決"如何做"的問(wèn)題。 　
【Abstract】 Answering truthfully and the right to silence, as a specific legal system, belongs to the "man-made objects" and have a specific function. However, they are the product of culture in stead of any design objects. Functional analysis solves such a problem as what roles answering truthfully and the right to silence play in the lawsuit structure. Culture can explain value judgment that contains in answering truthfully and the right to silence. To "annul" or to "establish" answering truthfully and the right to silence ultimately depends on the cultural value judgment.
 
【關(guān)鍵詞】 如實(shí)回答； 沉默權(quán)； 功能分析； 文化解釋?zhuān)?BR>【Key words】 truthful answer the right to silence functionalism cultural interpretation；
 
21 、論被害人過(guò)錯(cuò)與刑法寬容  龔義年（皖西學(xué)院政法學(xué)院）;  　
【摘要】 任何形式的"犯罪———被害",無(wú)一不是被害人與犯罪人之間二元互動(dòng)的結(jié)果。事實(shí)上,被害人通過(guò)其致害因素,直接或間接地、有意或無(wú)意地參與了與犯罪人之間的互動(dòng)。可以說(shuō),所有的被害人都對(duì)自己的被害亦即犯罪的發(fā)生負(fù)有不同程度的責(zé)任。既然如此,那么在對(duì)犯罪人定罪量刑時(shí),就應(yīng)當(dāng)考慮被害人的過(guò)錯(cuò)因素,對(duì)犯罪人給予適當(dāng)寬容�！�
【Abstract】 Any form of "crime-victim" is the result of interaction between the victim and the offender. In fact, the victim directly or indirectly, intentionally or unintentionally involved in the perpetrator’s interaction through its virulence factors. All the victims are victims of their crimes which bear varying degrees of responsibility. The criminal law should consider the fault of the victim, and give the offender appropriate tolerance.
 
【關(guān)鍵詞】 被害人過(guò)錯(cuò)； 刑法； 寬容；
【Key words】 victim′s fault criminal law Intolerance；
 
22 、論司法和諧的困境與前景:從法社會(huì)學(xué)角度  吳永科（渤海大學(xué)經(jīng)法學(xué)院）;  　
【摘要】 本文從司法和諧的基本內(nèi)容入手,論述了在當(dāng)代我國(guó)經(jīng)濟(jì)、政治、社會(huì)全面發(fā)展的背景下,實(shí)現(xiàn)司法和諧的現(xiàn)實(shí)困境,即"特權(quán)文化"心理促使人們追求逃避法規(guī)的特權(quán),泛行政化的權(quán)力結(jié)構(gòu)不利于實(shí)現(xiàn)司法公正,社會(huì)利益沖突加劇使司法和諧變得困難,社會(huì)價(jià)值多元化讓司法活動(dòng)受到更多拷問(wèn),從法社會(huì)學(xué)角度展望了我國(guó)"司法和諧"的前景�！�
【Abstract】 This article based on the content of justice harmony, analyzing the possibility and necessity and discoursing the difficulties of achieving justice harmony in contemporary Chinese economical, political and social development. The main difficulties are as follows: the psychology of "prerogative culture" encourages people to pursue the privilege of avoiding legal; pan-administration is bad for realizing judicatory impartiality; increasing conflicts of social benefit make justice harmony harder; multiple social values perplex judicial activity. This article also gives a outlook of justice harmony from the angle of legal social science.
 
【關(guān)鍵詞】 和諧社會(huì)； 司法； 法社會(huì)學(xué)；
【Key words】 harmonious society judicature social justice Law and Social Science；
 
 
23 、淺議能動(dòng)司法的理論與實(shí)踐  劉政（南京理工大學(xué)人文社會(huì)科學(xué)研究院）;  　
【摘要】 能動(dòng)司法是在借鑒西方司法制度與考察我國(guó)國(guó)情的基礎(chǔ)上形成的一種司法理念。由于其在提高司法效能、促進(jìn)司法正義等方面的特殊作用,已經(jīng)受到我國(guó)法學(xué)界和實(shí)務(wù)界的高度重視。本文通過(guò)在理論推導(dǎo)、實(shí)踐需求、價(jià)值取向等方面的研究,對(duì)踐行具有中國(guó)特色的適度的能動(dòng)司法進(jìn)行探析。 　
【Abstract】 Active judicature is a judicial philosophy in reference to the western judicial system and based on China national conditions. Since it’s effectiveness in improving the judicial efficacy and promoting the judicial justice, active judicature has been highly concerned by China’s legal academics and practitioners. This paper try to make a research on the practice of moderate active judicature with Chinese characteristic by means of theoretical analysis, practical needs research and value orientation research.
 
【關(guān)鍵詞】 能動(dòng)司法； 實(shí)踐需求； 價(jià)值取向； 模式選擇；
【Key words】 active judicature practical needs value orientation；
 
24 、立法過(guò)程中專(zhuān)家咨詢制度的多維面相  郝戰(zhàn)紅（北京航天航空大學(xué)公共管理學(xué)院）; 　
【摘要】 我國(guó)正處于全面建設(shè)小康社會(huì)的關(guān)鍵時(shí)期,利益多元化與利益失衡現(xiàn)象并存。如何有效地回應(yīng)社會(huì)需求,避免立法疏誤,提高立法品質(zhì),增強(qiáng)立法的正當(dāng)性是立法主體必須面對(duì)的問(wèn)題。專(zhuān)家咨詢制度具有多維面相,從政治民主的角度看是立法民主的表現(xiàn),從科學(xué)決策的角度看是立法科學(xué)的保證,從法治的角度看是立法合法的要求,從公共治理的角度看是立法正當(dāng)?shù)钠诖�。全面認(rèn)識(shí)和把握專(zhuān)家咨詢制度的多維面相,有助于充分發(fā)揮其在立法過(guò)程中的功能和作用。 　
【Abstract】 The interests of diversity and the interests of imbalances exist in Chinese critical period of building a moderately prosperous society. The legislature must face the problems of how to respond to the needs of society effectively, to avoid legislation sparse and error, to raise the quality of legislation, and to enhance the legitimacy of legislation. Expert consulting system have multi-dimensional image in the legislative process. Expert consulting system could forward the democratic legislative, ensure the scientific legislative, safeguard the legitimate legislative, and enhance the legitimacy of legislation. Only understand the multi-dimensional image of expert consulting system completely, could expert consulting system play more important role in the legislative process.
 
【關(guān)鍵詞】 立法過(guò)程； 專(zhuān)家咨詢； 法治； 正當(dāng)性；
【Key words】 legislative process expert consulting system rule of law legitimacy；
 
25 、論應(yīng)當(dāng)賦予侵權(quán)債權(quán)在破產(chǎn)分配中以優(yōu)先地位  馬東（西南政法大學(xué)）;  　
【摘要】 "三鹿"奶粉事件凸顯在企業(yè)大規(guī)模侵權(quán)下在破產(chǎn)程序中賦予侵權(quán)債權(quán)普通債權(quán)人的地位具有不合理性。賦予侵權(quán)之債債權(quán)以普通債權(quán)的地位是對(duì)私法概念的曲解,違背了民商法公平正義的價(jià)值理念,不符合商法追求社會(huì)效益的價(jià)值訴求�；�于此,應(yīng)當(dāng)賦予侵權(quán)之債在破產(chǎn)分配中以優(yōu)先地位。　
【Abstract】 Sanlu milk power scandal makes it clear that it is unreasonable to give mass tort claims ordinary status in the bankruptcy proceedings. To give tort claims ordinary status is a misunderstanding of the concept of private law and a violation of justice and social efficiency values of civil and commercial law. To this end, tort claims should be given priority in the order of distribution in bankruptcy.
 
【關(guān)鍵詞】 概念的體系性； 公平性； 效益性；
【Key words】 systematic of concept justice efficiency；
 
26 、我國(guó)股票期權(quán)激勵(lì)制度的法律問(wèn)題研究  張佩鈺（貴州師范大學(xué)法學(xué)院）; 
【摘要】 股票期權(quán)制度作為近年來(lái)在西方國(guó)家行之有效的一種企業(yè)激勵(lì)機(jī)制,在我國(guó)也得到了越來(lái)越廣泛的運(yùn)用。但由于相關(guān)法律制度的不完善、甚至空缺,我國(guó)大多數(shù)公司在這一制度的實(shí)施過(guò)程中遇到了各種問(wèn)題。改變我國(guó)現(xiàn)有的公司資本制度,為建立"庫(kù)存股"提供可操作性,并修改《公司法》與《證券法》中關(guān)于新股發(fā)行與股份回購(gòu)的相關(guān)規(guī)定,是有待解決的首要問(wèn)題之一;其次,將獨(dú)立董事納入激勵(lì)對(duì)象范圍,為激勵(lì)對(duì)象提供更多行權(quán)資金來(lái)源渠道,有助于提高該制度的實(shí)施效果;最后,修改《稅法》,給予股票期權(quán)制度更多稅收優(yōu)惠政策,更好地體現(xiàn)稅法在調(diào)節(jié)該制度激勵(lì)尺度和激勵(lì)方向上的杠桿作用�！�
【Abstract】 As a kind of effective incentive mechanism for enterprises in many western countries, stock option system has been utilized more and more in our country. But due to the deficiency or even the vacancy of the law, many corporations of our country encountered a series of problems in their practices. The chief important thing is changing the existing capital system and amending some related rules about issuing new stocks and recovering stocks of Corporation Law and Securities Law. Next, it helps to promote the implement effects that bring independent directors into incentive range and offer more source channels of funds. Finally, offer more preferential tax policies to stock option incentive system by amending Tax Law, and embody the lever function of tax law in adjusting the incentive scale and incentive orientation.
 
【關(guān)鍵詞】 股票期權(quán)； 激勵(lì)對(duì)象； 立法完善；
【Key words】 stock option incentive object improvement of legislation；
　
 
27 、論網(wǎng)絡(luò)著作權(quán)犯罪之“以營(yíng)利為目的”  王燕玲（華南師范大學(xué)法學(xué)院）; 
【摘要】 進(jìn)入網(wǎng)絡(luò)時(shí)代,行為人侵犯著作權(quán)犯罪的目的趨向多樣化。在網(wǎng)絡(luò)空間中,"以營(yíng)利為目的"的主觀構(gòu)成要件嚴(yán)重束縛了我國(guó)《刑法》的打擊范圍,對(duì)未經(jīng)授權(quán)作品的非法復(fù)制、再現(xiàn)作品的數(shù)量和速度決定了必須廢止"以營(yíng)利為目的"這一主觀要件。在我國(guó)現(xiàn)有的《刑法》規(guī)定和犯罪構(gòu)成框架下,不應(yīng)拘泥于傳統(tǒng)的營(yíng)利方式,而應(yīng)當(dāng)根據(jù)網(wǎng)絡(luò)營(yíng)利的特有模式進(jìn)行具體的認(rèn)定。 　
【Abstract】 After entering the internet age, the purposes of the criminal copyright infringement tend to diversify. In cyberspace, the subjective components, "for profit", has severely constrained the effective scope of China criminal law. The great amount and the speed of unauthorized illegal copying of works and reproductive works determines that the subjective element, "for profit", shall be abolished. The traditional way of judging "profit" shall not be followed under the current criminal law and crime constitution. A unique model shall be taken to specifically identify the "for profit" element according to the unique model of internet profit-making.
 
【關(guān)鍵詞】 網(wǎng)絡(luò)著作權(quán)犯罪； 營(yíng)利為目的； 廢止；
【Key words】 network copyright crime for profit repeal；
　
28 、對(duì)海上格式條款立法規(guī)制的完善  李兆良（武漢大學(xué)國(guó)際法研究所）;  　
【摘要】 大量存在的海上格式條款在促進(jìn)海上交易、提高效率的同時(shí),引起交易方權(quán)利義務(wù)不平衡等許多問(wèn)題�！逗Ｉ谭ā穼�(duì)海上格式條款的規(guī)制不夠完善。通過(guò)對(duì)海上格式條款存在的必然性、立法規(guī)制缺陷等的分析,可以明晰完善海上格式條款立法規(guī)制的意義,提出完善立法規(guī)制的具體建議。 　
【Abstract】 While promoting marine transactions, improving efficiency, the large number of existing marine standard terms causes many problems such as the imbalance of rights and obligations among the concerned parties. China’s Maritime Code has some regulations on marine standard terms, however, it needs to be perfected. From the analysis of the necessity for the marine standard terms to exist, the current situation and defect of legislative regulations on the marine standard terms, this article expounds the significance to perfect the legislative regulations on the marine standard terms and puts forward some suggestions to perfect them.
 
【關(guān)鍵詞】 海上格式條款； 立法規(guī)制； 完善；
【Key words】 marine standard terms legislative regulation perfection；
 
29 、美國(guó)企業(yè)并購(gòu)中涉稅影響的評(píng)介  孫曉妍（天津財(cái)經(jīng)大學(xué)商學(xué)院）;  　
【摘要】 合理的企業(yè)并購(gòu)戰(zhàn)略既重新配置經(jīng)濟(jì)中存量資源,促進(jìn)經(jīng)濟(jì)發(fā)展,還是企業(yè)經(jīng)營(yíng)邁向成功的契機(jī)。隨著我國(guó)海內(nèi)外并購(gòu)活動(dòng)的日趨活躍,稅收已經(jīng)成為影響企業(yè)并購(gòu)形式、交易成本等方面的重要因素,但并未引起國(guó)內(nèi)學(xué)者的重視。本文主要依據(jù)美國(guó)《國(guó)內(nèi)稅收法典》、《1986年稅收改革法案》,簡(jiǎn)要綜述國(guó)外學(xué)者對(duì)美國(guó)企業(yè)并購(gòu)中涉稅問(wèn)題的研究成果,闡明稅收因素對(duì)美國(guó)企業(yè)并購(gòu)的重要影響,為我國(guó)企業(yè)并購(gòu)提供借鑒,也為國(guó)內(nèi)并購(gòu)交易的稅收法規(guī)研究提供新的思路。 　
【Abstract】 Reasonable enterprise M&A strategy can not only rearrange economic stock resources to promote economic development, but also is the opportunity makes enterprise business successful. When China’s domestic and overseas M&A transactions are becoming increasingly active, tax factors have simultaneously become important factors that can affect M&A structures and trade cost and other aspects, which cannot be neglected. However, it still did not cause the attention of our scholars. This paper based on The Internal Revenue Code of U.S.A., reviews briefly foreign studies on tax subject of American enterprise M&A, which can expound the research results of the tax factors are the material influence on American enterprise M&A, provides references for domestic M&A and new ideas for study of domestic M&A on tax regulations
 
【關(guān)鍵詞】 企業(yè)并購(gòu)； 稅收規(guī)定； 影響評(píng)介；
【Key words】 enterprise M&A； tax regulations； influence review & commentaries；
 
30 、比較刑事訴訟法的研究進(jìn)路:從劃分模式到探求共性  印波（北京師范大學(xué)刑事法律科學(xué)研究所）;  
【摘要】 目前在世界范圍內(nèi)刑事訴訟法比較研究的主流進(jìn)路是劃分刑事訴訟程序模式。達(dá)馬斯卡的審問(wèn)/對(duì)抗模式和階層/同位模式是這種進(jìn)路的代表。唯模式論者往往關(guān)注刑事訴訟程序的差異而忽視它們的相似之處。本文參考英格拉姆對(duì)于不同法域刑事訴訟程序共性的探討,提出比較刑事訴訟法還應(yīng)采用探求共性的進(jìn)路,尋求相互理解的比較。內(nèi)容提要:目前在世界范圍內(nèi)刑事訴訟法比較研究的主流進(jìn)路是劃分刑事訴訟程序模式。達(dá)馬斯卡的審問(wèn)/對(duì)抗模式和階層/同位模式是這種進(jìn)路的代表。唯模式論者往往關(guān)注刑事訴訟程序的差異而忽視它們的相似之處。本文參考英格拉姆對(duì)于不同法域刑事訴訟程序共性的探討,提出比較刑事訴訟法還應(yīng)采用探求共性的進(jìn)路,尋求相互理解的比較。 　
【Abstract】 At present, the mainstream approach to comparative criminal procedure is to divide criminal procedure models. This approach is represented by inquisitorial/adversarial model-divides and hierarchical/coordinate model-divides created by Dama�峩a. The followers of this approach usually look at the divergences between different criminal procedures rather than the similarities. This thesis will make reference to the commonalities amongst criminal procedures in different jurisdictions studied by Ingraham. I intend to propose that an approach of exploring commonalities should be used for comparative criminal procedure. By means of this approach, a comparison with mutual understanding between different systems can be sought.
 
【關(guān)鍵詞】 比較刑事訴訟法； 研究進(jìn)路； 劃分模式； 探求共性；
【Key words】 comparative criminal procedure approach dividing models seeking commonalities；
 
31 、北京市機(jī)動(dòng)車(chē)排污權(quán)交易機(jī)制初探  李?yuàn)檴?羅薇（中國(guó)人民大學(xué)法學(xué)院）;  　
【摘要】 與傳統(tǒng)的行政管理和排污收費(fèi)模式相比,排污權(quán)交易模式在治理環(huán)境污染中具有突出的優(yōu)勢(shì)。機(jī)動(dòng)車(chē)排污交易機(jī)制的運(yùn)行應(yīng)在綜合性的環(huán)境治理模式中發(fā)揮自己的特殊作用,最終實(shí)現(xiàn)機(jī)動(dòng)車(chē)市場(chǎng)與大氣環(huán)境保護(hù)的協(xié)調(diào)可持續(xù)發(fā)展。北京市機(jī)動(dòng)車(chē)排污權(quán)交易面臨著一些困難,我們應(yīng)通過(guò)出臺(tái)政策和試點(diǎn)的方式循序漸進(jìn)地探索和建立機(jī)動(dòng)車(chē)排污權(quán)交易機(jī)制。　
【Abstract】 Compared with the traditional models of the administrative management and the pollution charges, the emission trading institution has the prominent advantages in the treatment of the environmental pollution. The emission trading institution for the motor vehicles will play an important role in the comprehensive environmental improvement models and contribute to the sustainable development of the motor markets and the atmospheric environment protection. First, the author explores the emission trading policies, the legislation and the practice, and then discusses the difficulties faced by the emission trading institution for the motor vehicles in Beijing. At last,the author makes a suggestion that the institution should be founded in a gradual way and the government could introduce the policies and set up pilot projects at the initial stage.
 
【關(guān)鍵詞】 排污權(quán)； 排污權(quán)交易； 機(jī)動(dòng)車(chē)排污權(quán)交易；
【Key words】 emission right the emission trading the emission trading for the motor vehicles；
 
 
 

日期：2012-7-24 14:55:11 | 關(guān)閉 |  分享到：