[ 尹科峰 ]——(2008-7-9) / 已閱14288次
[3] 張楠.羅馬法原論（下冊(cè)）[M]，北京：商務(wù)印書館，2001：98.
[4] 李子煊.對(duì)我國(guó)檢察機(jī)關(guān)參與公益訴訟的思索[A]，2006，（4）.
[5]莫諾.卡佩萊蒂.福利國(guó)家與接近正義[M] .劉俊祥等譯.北京：法律出版社，2002：67
[6] 陳衛(wèi)東.我國(guó)檢察權(quán)的反思和重構(gòu)――以公訴權(quán)為核心的分析[J].法學(xué)研究，2002(2).
[7] 湯志勇.論檢察監(jiān)督與司法公正的相恰互適性[M].檢察論叢（第五卷），北京：法律出版社，2002：52.
[8] 付子堂.法理學(xué)進(jìn)階［Ｍ］，北京：法律出版社，2003：338.
[9]王桂五.試論檢察機(jī)關(guān)在民事訴訟中的法律地位[J].中國(guó)政法大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)，1989，（3）.
Discussion and Practice on the Legitimacy of Procuratorate Public Interest Litigation in China
Abstract: The present our country procurator agency participates in the public interests law suit because lacks the concrete legal rule, in its experiment site impetus process has initiated the quite a lot dispute. To establish public interest litigation system in our country is essential for protecting national interests and social public interests, protecting our litigation system and legal supervision system, promoting international communication.
總共2頁(yè) [1] 2
上一頁(yè)
